Data on Demand: Engineering Synthetic Data to Improve Model Performance

Executive Summary

AI initiatives today face a data bottleneck. After a decade of big data investment, many organizations find model performance has plateaued – not due to algorithms, but due to limitations in the quantity and quality of real-world data. A telling statistic underscores the challenge: according to Gartner, 85% of AI projects fail to meet expectations primarily because of data issues (poor quality or lack of relevant data). Massive neural networks and ample cloud compute mean little if the training data is skewed, sparse or full of noise. This reality has become a boardroom concern: executives who green-lit big AI budgets are asking why pilots aren’t scaling. The answer often lies in the data pipeline, not the model architecture.

Traditional datasets have well-known shortcomings – they’re finite, messy, and riddled with gaps. Even tech giants with petabytes of user data encounter blind spots: rare events that never made it into the training set, or customer segments underrepresented in historical logs. The result is diminishing returns from real data alone. A Fortune 500 company might spend millions on data collection and labeling, only to see model accuracy plateau because the next 5% improvement lives in edge cases the dataset doesn’t cover. We are entering a data-centric era of AI, where feeding models better “fuel” is more critical than tinkering with model architectures. The nature of real-world data – full of biases, omissions, and privacy constraints – is becoming the chief bottleneck for advanced AI.

This is where synthetic data comes in. In essence, synthetic data is artificially generated information that mimics real data in statistical properties and structure, without directly using any actual records. In plain terms, it’s “fake” data that looks and behaves like the real thing. Crucially, it can be used to augment or even replace real datasets in AI development. Industry surveys suggest we are at an inflection point. For example, Gartner analysts predict that by the end of 2024, over 60% of data used to train AI models will be synthetic, up from just 1% in 2021. Looking further, Gartner’s forecasts (sometimes dubbed “Maverick” research) suggest that by 2030 synthetic data will overtake real data in AI development. In short, we’re on track for a future where more of our AI’s “experience” comes from simulated or generated data rather than direct observations of the real world.

What’s driving this shift? In a word: necessity. Organizations have wrung value from the real data they have, but to go further – to handle rare edge cases, to overcome privacy roadblocks, to eliminate sample bias – they need more and better data than the real world readily provides. Synthetic data offers a way to generate that data on-demand. It is already estimated that at least 20% of data used in some of today’s AI models is synthetic (in fields like finance and autonomous driving), and that share could exceed 80% by the late 2020s. Whether or not those exact figures materialize, it’s clear that synthetic data is moving from novelty to mainstream practice, fast.

Understanding Synthetic Data – Taxonomy of Techniques

Not all synthetic data is generated in the same way. It’s important to understand the taxonomy of synthetic data techniques, because different methods are suited to different problems. Broadly, we can distinguish three approaches to creating synthetic data:

· Data Augmentation – This is the simplest and most common form, often straddling the line between real and synthetic. Augmentation means taking an original dataset and generating new variants from it. Classic examples include flipping or rotating an image, adding noise to sensor readings, or swapping out words in a text string. Modern augmentation can be quite sophisticated (e.g. oversampling minority classes with slight alterations, or using neural style transfer to generate new images). Augmentation doesn’t create entirely new data from scratch; rather it extends and perturbs existing data. It’s a useful first step when you need a bit more diversity without departing far from known examples.

· Rule-Based Simulation – This approach uses explicit rules, domain knowledge, or physics-based simulators to programmatically generate data. Think of a finance team coding rules to synthesize realistic transaction records, or an engineer using a 3D physics engine to render lifelike images of virtual factory equipment. Rule-based simulation offers fine control: you can guarantee coverage of specific scenarios or rare events by scripting them. For instance, an autonomous vehicle simulator can be told to produce a sudden pedestrian crossing or a sensor malfunction, scenarios that might be too dangerous or too infrequent to capture easily in the real world. Essentially, this method models reality with software, leveraging expert knowledge to ensure plausibility.

· Fully Generative AI – In this cutting-edge approach, AI generates the data. Generative models (such as GANs, variational autoencoders, or the latest diffusion models) are trained on real datasets and then used to produce new, artificial data points that statistically resemble the originals. For example, a GAN (Generative Adversarial Network) can learn the distribution of actual images and then invent entirely new images that look “real” to a human – even though those images never actually happened. Fully generative techniques are powerful when you need samples beyond the range of your original data, or when manual simulation rules are too complex to encode. These models can capture subtle correlations and structures in data that humans might not think to simulate.

Importantly, these methods are often combined in practice. For instance, a self-driving car project might use a rule-based simulator for realistic vehicle dynamics and road conditions, then overlay GAN-generated textures or variations to add realism (like varying lighting or creating more diverse pedestrian appearances), and also apply data augmentation tricks to further expand coverage (such as randomly inserting obstacles or adjusting weather parameters). The end goal is the same: a richer and more comprehensive dataset than what the raw real-world data alone could provide.

In practice, building synthetic data capabilities follows a typical pipeline. Teams start by identifying the gaps or pain points in their real data. Then they select a generation strategy (from the above categories or a hybrid) and implement it – whether that means coding up a simulator or training a generative model. After generating synthetic data, validation is critical: comparing synthetic data distributions to real data, and testing AI model performance with synthetic versus real inputs, to ensure the synthetic data is actually useful. When done right, synthetic data can offer the best of both worlds – the scale, control, and speed of simulation with the statistical realism of actual data.

To make this more concrete, consider a few high-impact use cases where synthetic data is already proving its value:

Autonomous Driving – Rare Scenario Simulation: Self-driving car programs run virtual fleets that log millions of miles in simulation. This creates driving scenarios that would be too dangerous, rare, or time-consuming to wait for in reality. For example, developers can program a busy urban simulation to produce endless combinations of traffic situations – say, a child chasing a ball into the street on a rainy night – scenarios that even a massive real-world driving fleet might never capture in sufficient quantity. By training on these synthetic edge cases, autonomous vehicles learn to handle surprises safely. Waymo famously revealed that it had driven over 15 billion miles in simulation versus 20 million miles on real roads as of 2020, highlighting how pivotal synthetic data is to covering the long tail of driving situations.

Robotics & Industrial Automation – Safe Training and Testing: In robotics and industrial AI, synthetic data allows extensive training before ever deploying on a physical machine. Engineers use photorealistic 3D simulators to generate thousands of labeled images and sensor readings under varied conditions. For instance, a warehouse robot can be trained in virtual warehouses with countless aisle configurations, lighting variations, and object placements. This drastically reduces the need for costly and risky real-world trial-and-error. The result is that robots gain resilience and safety – they’ve already seen a wide variety of conditions in simulation – before they touch the actual assembly line or warehouse floor. Synthetic data thus accelerates development while protecting expensive hardware (and human workers) during the learning phase.

Finance and Healthcare – Privacy-Preserving Data Sharing: Banks, insurers, hospitals and others dealing with sensitive personal data are turning to synthetic data to protect privacy without sacrificing analytics. A classic example is a bank that needs data to improve a fraud detection model, but strict regulations (and ethical standards) prevent using real customer records. By generating fake transactions that statistically resemble real ones – same distributions of amounts, timings, merchant types, etc. – the bank can create a training dataset for its AI model that has no one’s actual personal information. The synthetic data provides “customer-like” patterns to learn from, but since no real person’s details are included, it sidesteps privacy laws. In effect, synthetic data can act as an anonymization tool far more robust than traditional de-identification, because it’s built from scratch to mirror the original data’s stats without containing any real identities. This enables data sharing and model development in domains where real data access is tightly restricted.

Fraud Detection and Rare Event Prediction – Imagining the Unseen: In fraud and risk analytics, historical datasets suffer from a key limitation: they only contain past known examples, which means they offer little guidance on novel attack vectors or rare events. Synthetic data offers a solution by generating plausible new fraud scenarios. For instance, an anomaly detection system for credit card fraud might be augmented with thousands of simulated fraudulent transactions that incorporate subtle patterns which haven’t yet occurred in reality but could happen. By training on this enriched dataset, the model becomes more adept at catching emerging fraud schemes that have no exact precedent in the historical data. The same logic applies to other areas like cybersecurity (simulating new attack techniques) or even operational risk (imagining rare equipment failures). In short, synthetic data can fill in the “unknown unknowns” – giving AI a sort of imaginative foresight, so it’s not blindsided by events just because they never happened before in the logs.

These case studies illustrate a theme: synthetic data is a force multiplier wherever real data is a limiting factor. It is broadening what’s possible in AI. Beyond the examples above, we’re seeing synthetic data applied to natural language processing (e.g. generating synthetic conversations to augment chatbot training), marketing analytics (simulating customer profiles and behaviors), and even national security (creating training data that avoids using classified intel). As the technology and trust in synthetic data grow, these use cases will only expand.

Quantifying the Benefits – Speed, Cost, and Beyond

For executives evaluating synthetic data, a fundamental question is: does it actually save time or money? Increasingly, the answer is yes – on both counts. Synthetic data, once the initial investment in generation capability is made, can deliver orders-of-magnitude efficiencies. Let’s break down the economics:

· Cost Per Data Point: Real-world data can be astonishingly expensive to collect and label at scale. Consider computer vision: obtaining a single high-quality labeled image might involve setting up cameras, collecting footage, then paying human annotators – all in, one estimate put this cost at about $6 per image for a complex bounding-box annotation task. By contrast, once you have a functioning simulator or generative model, the incremental cost of producing one more synthetic image is negligible – essentially some cloud compute and storage, just pennies per image. Internal analyses at LexData Labs and others find ratios on the order of 100× cost reduction. As a reference point, a synthetic data vendor illustrated that acquiring 100,000 real images with labels costs around $45,000, whereas generating a similar volume synthetically can cost a small fraction of that. The economies of scale are clear: after upfront setup, churning out the next million synthetic records is dramatically cheaper than a million more real ones.

· Speed and Time-to-Data: In AI development, time is often the bigger bottleneck than direct money cost. Real data collection is slow – you have to wait for events to occur naturally (or run lengthy experiments), then spend weeks or months on data cleaning and labeling. Synthetic data flips this dynamic. Need a new dataset? Spin up your simulation or generative model, and you might produce in hours what would take months in the physical world. For example, an autonomous driving team can simulate a year’s worth of varied driving scenarios overnight. This compression of the data cycle means AI projects move faster from proof-of-concept to production. In highly competitive domains, such speed can be decisive – it might mean being first to deploy a safer self-driving system or a more accurate fraud detector. Essentially, synthetic data lets teams iterate faster, trying multiple approaches while a competitor is still stuck waiting for the next data collection campaign to finish.

· Flexibility and Control: With synthetic data, we gain the ability to steer the data generation process, focusing on what matters. In a real dataset, you get what you get – and often that means an imbalance or a blind spot that’s nobody’s fault, just a reflection of reality. With synthetic generation, if your model is struggling on, say, nighttime driving incidents or a certain rare medical condition, you can intentionally produce more of that kind of data. This level of control is invaluable. It means the training data can be aligned to strategic needs. Want to test an AI system’s worst-case performance? Generate data for those worst cases. Want to remove a bias? Generate balanced data to counteract it. Traditional data is often called “the new oil,” but perhaps a better analogy here is synthetic fuel – engineered for performance, with the exact octane and additives needed for the engine to run best.

· Lower Compliance Burden: Using real-world data, especially personal or sensitive data, comes with heavy compliance overhead – privacy impact assessments, user consent management, data residency restrictions, GDPR mandates, and so on. Every time you use or share real data, there’s a risk (and rightly so) regarding privacy or security. Synthetic data largely sidesteps these issues. Since no real individuals are present in a properly generated synthetic dataset, many privacy regulations simply don’t apply (or are far easier to satisfy). Engineers can share and collaborate on synthetic datasets across borders without legal red tape, accelerating innovation. Gartner recently noted that by 2025, synthetic data and similar techniques will reduce personal customer data collection so much that 70% of privacy violation sanctions could be avoided. In practical terms, synthetic data can de-risk AI projects on the legal front – a significant intangible benefit.

· Energy and ESG considerations: One perhaps counterintuitive aspect is the potential sustainability benefit of synthetic data. Real-world data collection, especially in domains like automotive, aviation, or heavy industry, often involves physical trials that consume fuel, electricity, and materials. If we can replace some of that with simulations, the environmental footprint can shrink. For instance, virtual testing of an autonomous drone in a computer simulation uses electricity, but far less than building prototypes and flying real test missions repeatedly. One semiconductor manufacturer reported that using virtual “digital twins” for R&D cut carbon emissions of certain tests by ~74% compared to physical experimentation. Similarly, as noted earlier, Waymo’s 15 billion simulated miles are miles not driven on actual roads – think of the fuel and emissions saved (15 billion miles of driving would roughly equate to millions of gallons of fuel and over 5 million metric tons of CO₂ if done by conventional vehicles). That said, synthetic data isn’t energy-free – training sophisticated generative models or running large simulations consumes significant compute power. (In fact, training a single state-of-the-art AI model can emit an estimated 626,000 pounds of CO₂ – roughly the emissions of five cars over their entire lifetimes.) There is an environmental trade-off: we’re essentially shifting some impact from the physical domain to the digital domain. On balance, many scenarios still favor the digital – especially if cloud compute is powered by renewables – but organizations should factor energy costs into their synthetic data strategy and strive for efficient generation techniques.

In summary, synthetic data can dramatically bend the cost curve of AI development and unlock use cases that were impractical with real data alone. It provides leverage: do more, faster, with less dependence on external data collection. However, as we’ll discuss next, these advantages come with their own challenges to navigate.

Risks and Challenges of Synthetic Data

Synthetic data is not a silver bullet, and a savvy organization will approach it with eyes open to the potential pitfalls. Many of the failure modes of AI don’t disappear with synthetic data – in fact, a few new ones are introduced. Here we outline some key risks and how to mitigate them:

· Mode Collapse (Lack of Diversity): When using generative models like GANs to create data, there’s a known failure mode called mode collapse. This is when the generator produces a narrow range of outputs, effectively getting “stuck” churning out very similar samples. Instead of reflecting the full diversity of the real data distribution, the synthetic dataset ends up covering only a few modes. In practical terms, you thought you generated 10,000 new data points, but if many are near-duplicates, you perhaps got only 100 truly unique ones multiplied many times. The model has collapsed to a few popular patterns. As one explanation puts it, “in GANs, mode collapse happens when the generator focuses on producing a limited set of data patterns... and fails to capture the full diversity of the data distribution.” For example, a GAN generating faces might produce the same face with minor variations over and over, missing other demographics. Mode collapse reduces the value of synthetic data because it doesn’t actually introduce novel information – it’s like a student who memorized a few answers and repeats them. Mitigations: There are several techniques to combat mode collapse – adjusting training parameters, using architectures like WGANs (Wasserstein GANs) that are less prone to collapse, or generating data with multiple models/initializations to ensure diversity. It’s also critical to statistically check your synthetic outputs – measure distributions, uniqueness, coverage of known categories, etc., to catch if the generator has mode-collapsed. If detected, iterate on the model or mix in other data generation methods until diversity is satisfactory.

· “GAN Leakage” and Privacy Concerns: One allure of synthetic data is that it’s supposed to protect privacy by not containing real records. However, if not done right, generative models can inadvertently leak information from their training data. This is often via membership inference or reconstruction attacks. For instance, an attacker might analyze your synthetic dataset and determine that a particular person’s data must have been in the training set – thus learning something sensitive about that person. In worst cases, a poorly trained generator might even spit out a synthetic data point that is nearly identical to a real record it was trained on (this is a risk especially when the training set was small – the model might essentially memorize a record). This defeats the whole privacy purpose. As an example, a membership inference attack aims to determine if a given individual’s data was used to train the model by looking at the outputs; if synthetic data allows that, it’s leaking sensitive info. To mitigate these risks, teams use techniques like differential privacy during model training, or run specific leakage tests (e.g. try to re-identify known records from the synthetic set). The good news is that with careful design, synthetic data can be made highly private – but one should never assume “synthetic = private” without verification. Especially in regulated sectors, validating that your synthetic data generation process does not memorize or output any real personal data is a must.

· Simulator Bias and Unrealistic Data: With rule-based simulation, the old computer science adage applies: “garbage in, garbage out.” Your simulator is a model of the world, and all models are imperfect. If the simulation’s physics engine is off, or if the 3D assets and scenarios you include aren’t representative of reality, the resulting data could be systematically biased or incomplete. Models trained on that data will then carry those biases or brittleness. For example, if a robotics simulator renders every scene in perfect lighting and clean conditions, an AI vision model trained on those images might fail in the real world where lighting can be poor and sensors get dirty. Waymo’s team noted that earlier simulation engines failed to capture things like raindrops on a camera lens or glare from the sun, which in reality can confound the vision system. If your synthetic data never included these “messy” details, your AI might be unprepared for them. Mitigations: It’s important to invest in simulation realism – using high-fidelity graphics, physics, and domain randomization (randomly varying non-critical aspects of the environment each simulation run, to inject variety). Even so, one should validate models on a slice of real data before fully trusting them. Think of synthetic training as a boost, not a replacement for reality – you often still need a real-world test set or pilot phase to catch any mismatches. Additionally, involving domain experts to review synthetic data can catch obvious inaccuracies (e.g. a doctor reviewing synthetic medical records for plausibility, or a pilot reviewing a flight sim’s output).

· Synthetic Data Quality and EU AI Act Requirements: Some might assume that because synthetic data isn’t “real,” it might be exempt from data quality regulations. In fact, regulators are explicitly addressing synthetic data in forthcoming rules. The EU’s AI Act (likely to take effect in 2026) will impose strict requirements on training data for high-risk AI systems – data must be relevant, representative, free of errors, and complete for its intended use. This applies whether the data is real or synthetic. Article 10 of the EU AI Act sets these data governance standards, and even mentions synthetic data by name: Article 10(5)(a) clarifies that using special categories of personal data for bias correction is allowed only if other measures, including synthetic or anonymized data, won’t suffice. In other words, regulators recognize synthetic data as a tool for bias mitigation – but they will also expect organizations to demonstrate that their synthetic data itself is of high quality and not introducing new biases. If an AI system trained on synthetic data makes a harmful decision, the question will be asked: Did the synthetic data meet the standards? Was it appropriately representative? The lesson for companies is that synthetic data must be governed and documented just like real data. One should maintain provenance records, document how the synthetic data was generated, and perform bias and validity testing. (Indeed, implementing data lineage tracking in synthetic data pipelines is a recommended best practice – so you can trace which synthetic records came from which generator settings or templates.) The compliance landscape is evolving, but the direction is clear: synthetic data is not a get-out-of-jail-free card; you still need rigorous data governance and transparency around its use.

· User and Stakeholder Acceptance: A more human factor risk is whether stakeholders trust synthetic data. Early on, some data scientists or business users might be skeptical: “Isn’t this just fake data? How can we rely on it?” This cultural barrier shouldn’t be underestimated. If the people meant to use insights derived from synthetic data don’t buy in, the initiative could falter. We’ve seen cases where model developers had a bias for “real” data and were hesitant to incorporate synthetic augmentations, or where compliance officers needed education on why synthetic data is privacy-safe. The remedy here is largely educational and procedural. Pilot projects can demonstrate the boost from synthetic data (e.g. show that a model’s accuracy jumped from 72% to 90% when enriched with synthetic – a tangible before-and-after). Bringing stakeholders into the validation process also helps – for instance, letting subject-matter experts review synthetic samples to build confidence that “these look right.” In the end, synthetic data should be positioned as a validated supplement to real data, not a gimmick. With proper validation results and governance in place, most stakeholders come around to trust synthetic data as just another data source – one that can be extremely high quality if done carefully. It’s wise to set expectations: synthetic data isn’t magic; it won’t fix a fundamentally flawed project, but it can significantly accelerate and enhance a solid data strategy.

In summary, the smart strategy is a hybrid one: use synthetic data where it clearly adds value, but continue leveraging real data for what it alone can provide (ground-truth reality, final verification, the “unknown unknowns”). And keep humans in the loop – engineers and domain experts should continually sanity-check synthetic outputs. By understanding these risks and actively managing them, organizations can reap the benefits of synthetic data while avoiding the pitfalls.

Regulatory Impact: Synthetic Data in the Emerging AI Governance Landscape

The growing use of synthetic data is not happening in a vacuum – regulators and standards bodies are paying close attention. As mentioned, the EU AI Act explicitly covers data (including synthetic data) for high-risk AI systems. Under Article 10, any organization deploying an AI system in a high-risk area (like healthcare, finance, HR, etc.) will need to demonstrate solid data governance. This includes showing that the training data – real or synthetic – is appropriate, has been assessed for biases or errors, and is subject to robust management practices. The Act’s inclusion of synthetic data (e.g. Article 10(5)(a) allowing its use for bias correction under certain conditions approval of synthetic data as a tool, but also a reminder that it must be fit for purpose.

Beyond the AI Act, data privacy laws like GDPR remain relevant. There is an ongoing debate (both legal and technical) about when synthetic data is truly “anonymous” and thus outside GDPR scope. Some argue that if synthetic data is generated well enough that no individual can ever be re-identified, it should be considered anonymized and free to use. However, regulators haven’t fully blessed that interpretation yet. The prudent approach is to treat synthetic data with nearly the same care as real data when it comes to privacy – at least until you’ve proven and documented its safety. The Spanish Data Protection Agency and others have noted that the degree of similarity to original data is key: the more a synthetic dataset could be used to infer something about a real person, the less it can be considered truly anonymous. Thus companies should conduct privacy assessments of synthetic datasets (e.g. attempt membership inference attacks as discussed earlier, and keep records of the results).

On the positive side, regulators recognize synthetic data’s potential to enhance privacy and fairness. The European Commission’s Joint Research Centre has called synthetic data a “key enabler for AI” especially to reduce the need for personal data collection. Gartner has predicted that by 2025, synthetic data generation will result in 70% fewer privacy-related penalties for companies. And in the realm of fairness, synthetic data is explicitly mentioned in the AI Act as a means to correct bias when real-world data is insufficient. This could become an expectation: regulators may ask, “If your real data was imbalanced, did you consider using synthetic data to balance it?” In areas like credit scoring or hiring, where bias mitigation is crucial, synthetic data might even become a recommended practice to supplement or balance datasets (for instance, generating additional training examples for under-represented demographic groups, provided it actually improves fairness).

Another regulatory aspect is model transparency and documentation. Frameworks like ISO/IEC standards on AI or the U.S. NIST AI Risk Management Framework encourage documentation of data provenance. If a model was trained partly on synthetic data, that should be noted in model documentation (e.g. in a “Fact Sheet” or “Model Card”). It’s wise to document how the synthetic data was generated, what real data (if any) it was conditioned on, and what validation was performed. Such documentation builds trust with both regulators and business stakeholders.

Finally, industry-specific regulations may have their own twists. In healthcare, for example, using synthetic patient data might help with HIPAA compliance, but if that synthetic data is later used to support an FDA submission for a medical AI device, the FDA will want evidence of its validity. In finance, synthetic data can aid AML (anti-money laundering) model development, but regulators like the ECB or Fed might still require testing the model on real historical data before they are convinced.

The big picture is that synthetic data is coming of age in parallel with AI regulation. It is generally seen as a positive tool for compliance (since it can reduce privacy risk and bias), but organizations must be ready to show that they use it responsibly. That means investing in quality, bias audits, privacy checks, and transparency for synthetic datasets – just as they do for real datasets. Those who do so will find that regulators (and customers) view synthetic data initiatives favorably, as a mark of a forward-looking and responsible AI strategy.

When (Not) to Use Synthetic Data

Given all the pros and cons, an important strategic question is when is synthetic data the right approach? and conversely, when is it not appropriate. Based on industry experience, a few guiding considerations emerge:

You should consider synthetic data when:

· Data scarcity or imbalance is limiting your AI – If your model is starved for certain examples (rare events, minority classes), synthetic data is a strong candidate to fill those gaps. On the other hand, if you already have millions of diverse real records covering your problem well, the urgency for synthetic generation is lower. Use synthetic data to hit diminishing returns – the cases where more real data is hard to get.

· Privacy or compliance constraints block real data usage – This is a no-brainer: if legal or policy restrictions prevent you from using the real dataset you need, try to simulate a synthetic one that captures the essence without the sensitive details. For example, if patient data can’t leave a hospital due to HIPAA, consider generating a synthetic patient database that researchers can use freely without risking privacy. Synthetic data can be a workaround for data that’s locked down.

· It’s feasible to simulate or generate your domain – Some domains lend themselves well to simulation (physical systems, visual data, structured transactions) while others are harder (nuanced human behavior, purely social phenomena). Ask if your domain has good simulators or generative models available. Vision, speech, and tabular data have many tools; simulating human psychology or macroeconomics via synthetic data is more challenging. If an accurate simulation is out of reach, synthetic data might disappoint – or you may need a hybrid approach.

· Speed to market is critical and real data slows you down – If waiting for real data would delay an AI project by months or years (think of needing to gather years of sensor data vs. simulating it in weeks), synthetic data is a competitive advantage. This is especially true in fast-moving tech sectors or in wartime-like scenarios such as pandemic modeling, where you can’t afford to sit idle until real data catches up.

· You have a plan to validate and integrate the synthetic data – Simply creating piles of synthetic inputs isn’t helpful unless you know how you’ll use them. Ensure you have a validation plan (e.g. comparing synthetic data stats to real data, or checking model performance on a benchmark) and a strategy for mixing synthetic data into training (like what ratio of synthetic to real, or maybe pre-training on synthetic followed by fine-tuning on real). Essentially, be prepared to treat synthetic data as a first-class citizen in your data pipeline, with all the monitoring and evaluation that implies.

Conversely, situations where real data remains king:

· When real-world fidelity is paramount: Some applications demand a level of realism that today’s synthetic tech can’t guarantee. For example, if you are modeling a complex chaotic physics phenomenon (like turbulent airflow over a new aircraft wing), even high-end simulators might miss subtle effects. In such cases, actual experimental data is gold. If the cost of a modeling error is catastrophic, you likely want real data in the loop for ultimate validation.

· Final mile validation and proof: Even if you train models largely on synthetic data, regulators or clients may require proof on real data. A classic case is autonomous vehicles: a self-driving car company might train 90% in simulation, but regulators will still ask for real-world test drive results to certify safety. Similarly, a medical AI model might need a clinical trial on real patients for FDA approval, no matter how much synthetic data was used in development. So, synthetic data can get you to a great model faster – but the final sign-off often still involves real-world testing. Plan accordingly (and don’t claim synthetic data alone proves efficacy).

· Richness and “texture” of data matters: In creative or human-centric AI tasks, real data often has a richness that is hard to fake. For example, training a generative art AI using only synthetic art (say art produced by some rules) could yield boring, derivative outputs – lacking the spark of real human creativity. Or a music recommendation algorithm fed only simulated user playlists might miss the quirks of real human taste. Whenever the soul or texture of the data is itself the point (photographic detail, slang and humor in text, the emotive quality of music), you should be cautious about synthetic data smoothing those out. We’re getting better at generating “real-feel” data (with advanced GANs and such), but we’re not 100% there yet.

In essence, synthetic data is a powerful augmentation, not a total replacement. The best results often come from hybrid approaches: leverage synthetic data to boost coverage and diversity, while still collecting real data for what it alone can provide (ground-truth authenticity and surprise factors). And always verify that your models perform well on real-world benchmarks, even if they were trained on a synthetic buffet.

Strategic Roadmap: A Four-Stage Framework for Synthetic Data Success

Adopting synthetic data in an enterprise setting is not a one-off task – it’s a program that involves strategy, technology, and governance. Based on our experience at LexData Labs, we propose a four-stage strategic framework to guide organizations in leveraging synthetic data effectively:

Stage 1: Strategy and Assessment – Identify the Need and Value Everything should start with a clear understanding of why and where to use synthetic data. In this stage, executives and data leaders define the objectives: which business problem or KPI are we trying to impact? For example, is the goal to improve a model’s defect detection rate from 85% to 95%? Reduce churn by better modeling rare customer behaviors? Once goals are set, perform a data audit. Catalog your existing data assets and pinpoint the gaps or pain points. Perhaps you discover that a certain critical scenario has almost no real data, or that privacy rules prevent using the customer data you collected in a new AI project. This is also the time to gauge feasibility: can we realistically generate the needed data? (If you need data on, say, extreme market crashes, can you simulate that? If you need dialogues in Urdu, do tools exist for that?) The outcome of Stage 1 is a business case and plan: a shortlist of use cases where synthetic data would add clear value (backed by ROI estimates or risk mitigation arguments), and an executive mandate to proceed.

Stage 2: Design and Generation – Build the Synthetic Data Pipeline In Stage 2, the focus shifts to how to generate the data. This involves choosing the appropriate generation technique(s) (augmentation, simulation, GANs, etc.), and then implementing the pipeline. It might mean selecting a simulation platform (or building one), or training a generative model on real data. Often, a hybrid approach is best: for instance, use a physics-based simulator for realism and then a GAN to increase variability of outputs. Key actions in this stage include assembling the right team (data engineers, domain experts, possibly simulation/modeling specialists), and infusing domain knowledge into the generation process. If generating financial transactions, have finance experts ensure the fake data obeys realistic constraints (no negative balances, weekends have different patterns, etc.). If simulating factory images, work with engineers so that synthetic images reflect real operating conditions. By the end of Stage 2, you should have a prototype synthetic data generator capable of producing initial datasets. This stage is iterative – you’ll likely refine the generator multiple times upon review of its outputs.

Stage 3: Integration and Modeling – Leverage Synthetic Data in AI Development Stage 3 is where synthetic data actually meets your AI models. With a generator in hand, produce the first full batch of synthetic data (potentially scaling up to volumes larger than your real dataset). Now, integrate it into model training. This could take forms like: training a model from scratch on 100% synthetic data and then fine-tuning on real data, or mixing synthetic and real data at a certain ratio from the start, or using synthetic data to pre-train a model’s feature extractor. Monitor model performance closely on a validation set of real data (held-out real data is crucial as a yardstick). The exciting part of this stage is seeing if – and by how much – the model’s metrics improve thanks to synthetic data. For instance, perhaps your baseline model (trained on real data only) had 72% recall, and now with additional synthetic data it achieves 90% recall on the same test set. That kind of lift validates the approach. Be prepared to tune hyperparameters or model architecture; sometimes models might need to be a bit more complex to fully utilize the larger training set, or you may need to regularize more if synthetic data introduces noise. This stage should also involve rigorous quality checks on the synthetic data itself: compare distributions (means, variances, correlations) between synthetic and real data; have humans do spot checks (do synthetic images “look right”? do synthetic records pass sanity checks?). Often, you might discover something like “our synthetic images were too perfect – no sensor noise”, prompting a tweak to the generation process. Stage 3 is an iterative loop of generate → train → evaluate → adjust. By its end, you aim to have a trained model (or models) that demonstrably outperform the prior state, with synthetic data playing a key role in that success.

Stage 4: Deployment and Governance – Deploy with Confidence and Set Up Ongoing Governance The final stage concerns operationalizing the models and establishing long-term governance for synthetic data use. First, validate the model in real-world conditions (or as close as possible). For a model going to production, this might mean a pilot deployment or A/B test to ensure the performance gains hold up with live data. It’s important here to use real data as the ultimate test – for example, if a fraud detection model was enhanced with synthetic fraud scenarios, ensure it’s catching real fraud cases that were previously missed. Once validated, proceed to production deployment. Now, from a data governance perspective, treat your synthetic data generator as a new component of your data infrastructure. Put in place monitoring: for instance, if real-world data starts drifting (new trends the generator wasn’t designed for), you might need to update the synthetic data accordingly. Track lineage of synthetic data points (as mentioned earlier, recording the parameters that produced each synthetic record) so that you can audit and debug. If the model makes an odd prediction, lineage can help trace if perhaps certain synthetic scenarios were over- or under-sampled. At this stage, also loop back with compliance and documentation: log what synthetic data was used, and ensure you could explain it to an auditor if needed (“We augmented our training with 50,000 synthetic transactions generated by method X to cover scenario Y, which lacked sufficient real data”). Essentially, Stage 4 is about institutionalizing synthetic data into your AI life cycle. Rather than a one-time project, it becomes an ongoing capability. As new real data comes in from production, you continuously assess if new synthetic data generation is needed to cover emerging cases, thereby creating a virtuous cycle of improvement.

This four-stage framework (Strategy → Generation → Integration → Governance) provides a roadmap to systematically and responsibly roll out synthetic data in an organization. It’s analogous to a mini data strategy within your AI strategy. Notably, these stages map well to existing AI project phases – we’re just inserting synthetic data into the mix. By following a structured approach, companies can avoid random experiments that go nowhere, and instead achieve repeatable, scalable success with synthetic data.

Executive Action Checklist

For an executive or project sponsor overseeing synthetic data initiatives, the following action checklist distills the above framework into key steps and decision points:

· ✅ Define Clear Objectives: Identify the specific problem where data is lacking and articulate how synthetic data will address it (e.g., “increase rare defect detection accuracy by generating more examples of defect type X”). Secure stakeholder alignment on these goals.

· ✅ Audit and Gap Analysis: Inventory your existing data and pinpoint gaps, imbalances, or privacy constraints. Document why current data is insufficient and set criteria for success (e.g., model needs +10% precision on minority class).

· ✅ Assess Feasibility: Consult domain experts and data scientists to choose the right synthetic data approach. Can you simulate the domain with physics or rules? Do you need to train a GAN or other generative model? Evaluate tools/vendors if applicable. Ensure you have (or can acquire) the skills and compute resources required.

· ✅ Establish Governance Early: Even as you start generation, put in place a plan for quality assurance. Decide how you will validate synthetic data (statistical similarity tests, expert review) and how you will safeguard privacy (e.g., no real record leakage tests). Involve compliance or legal teams upfront if sensitive data is in scope.

· ✅ Pilot the Generation Process: Develop a prototype generator and produce a sample synthetic dataset. Have end-users or subject-matter experts review it for plausibility. Use this pilot to iterate on parameters and build confidence. It’s cheaper to adjust now than after full-scale generation.

· ✅ Integrate and Benchmark: Train or retrain your AI model using the new synthetic data (alone or combined with real data). Benchmark the results against previous models. Use a holdout of real data as the ultimate test. Look not just at aggregate metrics but also where improvements are occurring – did synthetic data actually help on the targeted gaps?

· ✅ Monitor for Unintended Effects: Check if adding synthetic data caused any degradation on other parts of the model’s performance (for example, did overall accuracy drop or did a bias shift elsewhere?). Ensure you didn’t introduce new bias – compare model outputs across demographics before and after. If any negative side effects are found, adjust the strategy (maybe use a smaller synthetic share, or different generation technique).

· ✅ Document and Communicate Results: Quantify the impact of synthetic data (e.g., “Model AUC improved from 0.80 to 0.88 by adding 20k synthetic samples covering scenario Y”). Prepare this information for both internal learning and external audit if necessary. Communicate success to stakeholders to reinforce buy-in, or communicate learnings if results were mixed.

· ✅ Plan Deployment with Validation: Before fully deploying the model influenced by synthetic data, do a sanity check on real-world inputs. For high-stakes applications, consider a phased rollout or shadow mode testing to ensure performance holds. Maintain transparency – if asked by a client or regulator, be ready to explain that synthetic data was used and why.

· ✅ Institutionalize the Capability: If the pilot is successful, integrate synthetic data generation into your standard AI development workflow. Train teams on using the tools. Allocate budget for maintaining and updating simulation models or generative models as the real world changes. Set policies for when new synthetic data should be generated (triggered by model drift or new edge cases discovered in production, for example).

By following this checklist, executives can ensure synthetic data initiatives deliver real value and do so responsibly. The checklist emphasizes not just the technical steps, but also governance and stakeholder management – which often make the difference between a promising prototype and a production success.

Conclusion

In conclusion, synthetic data has moved from academic novelty to practical necessity in the AI toolkit. It allows organizations to unlock new levels of performance, mitigate data risks, and accelerate AI development in ways that simply weren’t feasible a few years ago. We are seeing a paradigm shift: instead of being passive consumers of whatever data the world happens to provide, companies can now actively create the data they need to succeed – an immensely powerful capability.

However, as we’ve detailed, this power must be used wisely. Quality over quantity remains a mantra – flooding a model with millions of poor-quality synthetic points won’t help. The most successful adopters treat synthetic data generation as a discipline in its own right, with rigorous design, testing, and governance. When done right, synthetic data becomes a competitive advantage and even a moat: it’s data that your competitors don’t have, and it’s tailored exactly to your needs.

At LexData Labs, we position ourselves as a trusted advisor and partner in this journey. We’ve helped organizations craft synthetic data strategies, build robust generation pipelines, and govern them in line with best practices and regulations. We start with the business problem, quantify the impact, and then guide the technical implementation end-to-end. From identifying high-value use cases and quick-win pilot projects, to developing simulation environments or generative models, to instituting governance frameworks – our team has done it. We understand that adopting synthetic data is as much a cultural shift as a technical one, and we help clients navigate that change curve.

In the coming years, as AI projects continue to mushroom and regulations tighten, synthetic data readiness will become a hallmark of AI maturity. Organizations that have invested in this capability will be able to respond faster to new challenges (because they can generate the data needed to address them), and they’ll enjoy greater flexibility in complying with privacy and fairness requirements (because they have alternative ways to get data). In contrast, organizations that stick strictly to organic data may find themselves constrained and lagging.

To any executive or data leader reading this, the message is clear: the time to evaluate synthetic data is now. Start small if you must, but start soon – identify a pilot where synthetic data could make a difference, and learn from it. Use the framework and checklist we’ve provided as a guide. And don’t hesitate to seek expert help to avoid pitfalls, because there is a growing body of knowledge (and yes, war stories of what not to do) in this field.

Synthetic data is not “fake” data – it is engineered data, designed for purpose. With a purposeful strategy, what today might seem like “data scarcity” in your organization can be turned into abundance. Those companies that master synthetic data will not only boost their AI initiatives in the short term, but also future-proof their data strategy in an era of ever-increasing data demands and constraints. In the end, synthetic data is about unlocking possibility: the possibility to explore scenarios beyond the confines of our past experience, to innovate faster, and to do so while upholding privacy and ethics. In that sense, synthetic data isn’t just an AI tool – it’s becoming a cornerstone of responsible, sustainable AI innovation.

References

· Di Pietro, G. (2024). Why 85% of AI projects fail and how to save yours. Dynatrace Engineering Blog.

· Morrison, R. (2023). The majority of AI training data will be synthetic by next year, says Gartner. TechMonitor (August 2, 2023).

· Bridgenext Think Tank. (2023). AI-Generated Synthetic Data – Redefining Boundaries in ML Training. Bridgenext Blog (Aug 24, 2023).

· El Emam, K. (2021). New Gartner survey suggests synthetic data is the future of data sharing. Aetion Evidence Hub (Nov 9, 2021).

· Wieclaw, M. (2025). What Is a CNN Model in Deep Learning and How Does It Work? aiquestions.co.uk (May 17, 2025).

· syntheticAIdata. (2022). How much does computer vision AI model training cost without using Synthetic Data? syntheticAIdata Blog (Sep 20, 2022).

· Hawkins, A. (2021). Welcome to Simulation City, the virtual world where Waymo tests its autonomous vehicles. The Verge (July 6, 2021).

· Kumar, A. & Davenport, T. (2023). How to Make Generative AI Greener. Harvard Business Review (July 20, 2023).

· Wu, B. (2023). AI’s Growing Carbon Footprint. Columbia Climate School – State of the Planet (June 9, 2023).

· Vranešević Grbić, L. (2024). Synthetic Data in the Spotlight: Compliance Insights on the AI Act and the GDPR. Vranesevic Law Blog (Dec 10, 2024).

· Topal, M. (2023). What is Mode Collapse in GANs? Medium (July 23, 2023).

· MOSTLY AI. (2023). Membership Inference Attack. The Synthetic Data Dictionary, MOSTLY AI Docs (Jan 12, 2023).

· Carruthers, C. (2023). Commentary in TechMonitor article “Most AI training data will be synthetic...” (Carruthers & Jackson).

· LexData Labs. (2025). Dark Data: The Hidden Treasure Trove

‍