Skip to content
LexDataLexData
PlatformIndustriesCustomers
DocsThe Field GuideBlogWhy models drift
AboutCareersSecurityContact
Log inStart now

// INSURANCE

Fraud Detection

Fraud Detection. What it takes to run it.

Identify recycled photos, metadata tampering, and staged accidents.

Start with your footageAll of insurance →

// 01 · The question

“Have we seen this damage, this vehicle or this photograph before?”

// 02 · Why it is hard

The other side adapts. Anything that is caught reliably stops being submitted, which means the distribution of what you see is shaped by what your own model already blocks.

// 03 · What the labels have to be

Instance segmentation

Decided before the first frame

The comparison is between damage patterns, and a pattern is a shape. Matching a mask against previously claimed masks is what catches a recycled photograph that has been cropped, rotated or lightly edited.

This is the decision that is expensive to reverse. The geometry has to match what the answer contains, and finding out it does not means labelling the set a second time.

// 04 · How we run it

Three parts of one loop, on this job.

LexAnnotate

Damage Segmentation

Annotate vehicle damage, property defects, and workplace safety conditions with precision bounding boxes and segmentation. Human-in-the-loop verification reduces blind spots in complex edge cases.

LexInsight

Risk Profiling

Link visual damage assessments to claims data, vehicle databases, and property records. Track damage progression over time for workers' comp and commercial property monitoring.

LexAlert

Accuracy Alerts

Monitor deployed claims models as vehicle fleets evolve. Detect accuracy drift when new vehicle types, lighting conditions, or inspection regions change. Auto-retrain before the drift reaches the claims desk.

How the loop fits together →

// 05 · What breaks it after launch

Prior shift

The defect rate changed

→Prior shift →

Prior shift is the native failure here. Per-image judgement stays fine while the base rate moves, so the flagged volume and every downstream reserve figure stop making sense before any accuracy metric moves.

It is not the only one that can get this use case, it is the one that usually gets it first. All ten conditions.

// 06 · In insurance

Claims Automation Stability

Full write-up ↓Every case study →

The Challenge

Damage detection models struggled as vehicle types, lighting, and edge cases increased. Inconsistent visuals caused false positives.

Our Execution

Created production-ready visual datasets. Applied human-in-the-loop validation to reduce blind spots.

The Result

Stabilized accuracy across varied real-world conditions. Reduced manual claim reviews.

6,000+

Cases resolved per month

// 07 · Also in insurance

Auto Damage Estimation→Property Risk Analysis→Workers' Compensation→Catastrophe Response→Fleet Condition Monitoring→All forty-one→
Auto Damage EstimationProperty Risk AnalysisWorkers' CompensationCatastrophe ResponseFleet Condition MonitoringAll forty-one →

Send us a week of this footage. We’ll show you what comes back.

Start with your footageBook a demo →
LexData
LexData

Product

  • Platform
  • Industries
  • Use cases

Resources

  • Docs
  • The Field Guide
  • Blog
  • Why models drift

Industries

  • Energy & utilities
  • Oil & gas
  • Agriculture
  • Manufacturing
  • Insurance
  • Retail
  • Robotics

Company

  • About
  • Customers
  • Careers
  • Contact

Trust

  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Stay updated

What we learn running vision models in production.

See everything.
Miss nothing.

Stay updated

What we learn running vision models in production.

Terms of use & Privacy policy

© 2026 LexData Labs · All rights reserved