Skip to content
LexDataLexData
PlatformIndustriesCustomers
DocsThe Field GuideBlogWhy models drift
AboutCareersSecurityContact
Log inStart now

// INSURANCE

Fleet Condition Monitoring

Fleet Condition Monitoring. What it takes to run it.

Automated inspection for rental and commercial vehicle fleets.

Start with your footageAll of insurance →

// 01 · The question

“What is new since this vehicle went out?”

// 02 · Why it is hard

It has to be defensible to a customer who disputes it. The comparison is only as good as the consistency of the two captures, which is why this is the use case where capture standardisation matters most.

// 03 · What the labels have to be

Instance segmentation

Decided before the first frame

The output is a difference between two inspections, and a difference between outlines is meaningful where a difference between boxes is not. Chargeable damage is decided by size against a documented threshold.

This is the decision that is expensive to reverse. The geometry has to match what the answer contains, and finding out it does not means labelling the set a second time.

// 04 · How we run it

Three parts of one loop, on this job.

LexAnnotate

Damage Segmentation

Annotate vehicle damage, property defects, and workplace safety conditions with precision bounding boxes and segmentation. Human-in-the-loop verification reduces blind spots in complex edge cases.

LexInsight

Risk Profiling

Link visual damage assessments to claims data, vehicle databases, and property records. Track damage progression over time for workers' comp and commercial property monitoring.

LexAlert

Accuracy Alerts

Monitor deployed claims models as vehicle fleets evolve. Detect accuracy drift when new vehicle types, lighting conditions, or inspection regions change. Auto-retrain before the drift reaches the claims desk.

How the loop fits together →

// 05 · What breaks it after launch

Covariate shift

A camera was replaced

→Covariate shift →

Re-equip the inspection lanes and every before-and-after pair straddles a change in optics and resolution. Damage that was invisible at the old resolution appears as new damage at the new one.

It is not the only one that can get this use case, it is the one that usually gets it first. All ten conditions.

// 06 · In insurance

Claims Automation Stability

Full write-up ↓Every case study →

The Challenge

Damage detection models struggled as vehicle types, lighting, and edge cases increased. Inconsistent visuals caused false positives.

Our Execution

Created production-ready visual datasets. Applied human-in-the-loop validation to reduce blind spots.

The Result

Stabilized accuracy across varied real-world conditions. Reduced manual claim reviews.

6,000+

Cases resolved per month

// 07 · Also in insurance

Auto Damage Estimation→Property Risk Analysis→Workers' Compensation→Fraud Detection→Catastrophe Response→All forty-one→
Auto Damage EstimationProperty Risk AnalysisWorkers' CompensationFraud DetectionCatastrophe ResponseAll forty-one →

Send us a week of this footage. We’ll show you what comes back.

Start with your footageBook a demo →
LexData
LexData

Product

  • Platform
  • Industries
  • Use cases

Resources

  • Docs
  • The Field Guide
  • Blog
  • Why models drift

Industries

  • Energy & utilities
  • Oil & gas
  • Agriculture
  • Manufacturing
  • Insurance
  • Retail
  • Robotics

Company

  • About
  • Customers
  • Careers
  • Contact

Trust

  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Stay updated

What we learn running vision models in production.

See everything.
Miss nothing.

Stay updated

What we learn running vision models in production.

Terms of use & Privacy policy

© 2026 LexData Labs · All rights reserved