Skip to content
LexDataLexData
PlatformIndustriesCustomers
DocsThe Field GuideBlogWhy models drift
AboutCareersSecurityContact
Log inStart now

// MANUFACTURING

Weld Quality Inspection

Weld Quality Inspection. What it takes to run it.

Automated analysis of weld porosity, undercut, and spatter.

Start with your footageAll of manufacturing →

// 01 · The question

“Is this weld sound, and if not, which defect is it?”

// 02 · Why it is hard

The defect classes look similar to a non-specialist and the acceptance criteria are code-driven, so the labelling standard has to come from the customer's own procedure rather than from general practice.

// 03 · What the labels have to be

Instance segmentation

Decided before the first frame

Weld standards are written in terms of length and area of the discontinuity. Porosity, undercut and spatter are graded by extent, so the label has to be measurable against the same standard the inspector uses.

This is the decision that is expensive to reverse. The geometry has to match what the answer contains, and finding out it does not means labelling the set a second time.

// 04 · How we run it

Three parts of one loop, on this job.

LexAnnotate

Defect Annotation

Pixel-level defect annotation for surface scratches, cracks, dents, weld faults, and assembly misalignments. Multi-sensor alignment for multi-camera inspection systems.

LexInsight

Line Performance

Connect defect detections to production data - batch numbers, machine IDs, shift schedules. Identify defect patterns across lines and predict maintenance needs before unplanned downtime.

LexAlert

Quality Alerts

Monitor defect detection accuracy across changing production conditions. Detect when lighting shifts, new materials, or equipment aging degrades model performance. Auto-retrain to maintain 99%+ accuracy.

How the loop fits together →

// 05 · What breaks it after launch

Covariate shift

The equipment changed

→Covariate shift →

A change of wire, shielding gas or torch changes the bead's appearance across the board. Every weld now looks slightly unfamiliar, and the model's confidence sags on good and bad alike.

It is not the only one that can get this use case, it is the one that usually gets it first. All ten conditions.

// 06 · In manufacturing

Defect Detection at Scale

Full write-up ↓Every case study →

The Challenge

Vision models performed well in pilots but lost accuracy as factory conditions shifted.

Our Execution

Built pixel-level annotated datasets and multi-sensor alignment for reliable defect detection.

The Result

Maintained 99%+ defect detection accuracy across changing production environments. Reduced unplanned downtime.

99%+

Accuracy maintained in production

// 07 · Also in manufacturing

Surface Defect Detection→Assembly Verification→Package & Label Inspection→Predictive Maintenance→Multi-Sensor Monitoring→All forty-one→
Surface Defect DetectionAssembly VerificationPackage & Label InspectionPredictive MaintenanceMulti-Sensor MonitoringAll forty-one →

Send us a week of this footage. We’ll show you what comes back.

Start with your footageBook a demo →
LexData
LexData

Product

  • Platform
  • Industries
  • Use cases

Resources

  • Docs
  • The Field Guide
  • Blog
  • Why models drift

Industries

  • Energy & utilities
  • Oil & gas
  • Agriculture
  • Manufacturing
  • Insurance
  • Retail
  • Robotics

Company

  • About
  • Customers
  • Careers
  • Contact

Trust

  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Stay updated

What we learn running vision models in production.

See everything.
Miss nothing.

Stay updated

What we learn running vision models in production.

Terms of use & Privacy policy

© 2026 LexData Labs · All rights reserved