Skip to content
LexDataLexData
PlatformIndustriesCustomers
DocsThe Field GuideBlogWhy models drift
AboutCareersSecurityContact
Log inStart now

// MANUFACTURING

Surface Defect Detection

Surface Defect Detection. What it takes to run it.

High-speed identification of scratches, dents, and cracks.

Start with your footageAll of manufacturing →

// 01 · The question

“Does this part ship, get reworked, or get scrapped?”

// 02 · Why it is hard

Defects are small, low-contrast and photographed on reflective surfaces where a lighting artefact looks exactly like a flaw. And the good parts vastly outnumber the bad, so the training set is unbalanced by construction.

// 03 · What the labels have to be

Instance segmentation

Decided before the first frame

Disposition is a severity call, and severity is size and location on the part. A scratch of a certain length in a cosmetic zone is a different decision from the same scratch on a hidden face, and only a mask carries the length.

This is the decision that is expensive to reverse. The geometry has to match what the answer contains, and finding out it does not means labelling the set a second time.

// 04 · How we run it

Three parts of one loop, on this job.

LexAnnotate

Defect Annotation

Pixel-level defect annotation for surface scratches, cracks, dents, weld faults, and assembly misalignments. Multi-sensor alignment for multi-camera inspection systems.

LexInsight

Line Performance

Connect defect detections to production data - batch numbers, machine IDs, shift schedules. Identify defect patterns across lines and predict maintenance needs before unplanned downtime.

LexAlert

Quality Alerts

Monitor defect detection accuracy across changing production conditions. Detect when lighting shifts, new materials, or equipment aging degrades model performance. Auto-retrain to maintain 99%+ accuracy.

How the loop fits together →

// 05 · What breaks it after launch

Concept drift

The spec changed

→Concept drift →

Quality tightens the threshold and the images do not change at all. Parts the model was taught to pass are now failures, so it stays confident and starts being wrong, and no confidence monitor can detect it.

It is not the only one that can get this use case, it is the one that usually gets it first. All ten conditions.

// 06 · In manufacturing

Defect Detection at Scale

Full write-up ↓Every case study →

The Challenge

Vision models performed well in pilots but lost accuracy as factory conditions shifted.

Our Execution

Built pixel-level annotated datasets and multi-sensor alignment for reliable defect detection.

The Result

Maintained 99%+ defect detection accuracy across changing production environments. Reduced unplanned downtime.

99%+

Accuracy maintained in production

// 07 · Also in manufacturing

Weld Quality Inspection→Assembly Verification→Package & Label Inspection→Predictive Maintenance→Multi-Sensor Monitoring→All forty-one→
Weld Quality InspectionAssembly VerificationPackage & Label InspectionPredictive MaintenanceMulti-Sensor MonitoringAll forty-one →

Send us a week of this footage. We’ll show you what comes back.

Start with your footageBook a demo →
LexData
LexData

Product

  • Platform
  • Industries
  • Use cases

Resources

  • Docs
  • The Field Guide
  • Blog
  • Why models drift

Industries

  • Energy & utilities
  • Oil & gas
  • Agriculture
  • Manufacturing
  • Insurance
  • Retail
  • Robotics

Company

  • About
  • Customers
  • Careers
  • Contact

Trust

  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Terms

Stay updated

What we learn running vision models in production.

See everything.
Miss nothing.

Stay updated

What we learn running vision models in production.

Terms of use & Privacy policy

© 2026 LexData Labs · All rights reserved